Friday, August 30, 2013

REPOST: Three ways EHR adoption can improve the patient experience

Electronic healthcare records (EHRs) are implemented by the most successful healthcare institutions in the country.  In an article for EHR intelligence, Pat Wolfram enumerates three ways the patient experience can be improved by adopting EHRs.

There are many key players integral to the patient experience. One specific triad of relationships that significantly affects the patient experience is the relationship between labs, practices, and electronic health records (EHRs).
While more than half of all doctors have adopted EHRs to improve workflow and enhance patient care, most orders for diagnostic tests are still made outside of the EHR, and many healthcare groups do not fully realize the benefits of connecting to multiple labs through the EHR. Connecting practices to all labs and radiology services with which they regularly work provides three significant benefits: better patient care, improved workflow, and easy access to data.

Image Source: www.healthcare.asdc.com
Better patient care
Physicians rely on the EHR to simplify their day and allow them to focus on providing quality care for the patient they are seeing at the moment. The ability to order lab, diagnostic, and radiology tests through the EHR at the time of the patient exam ensures the tests are ordered accurately and any required information from the patient can be collected in person rather than requiring later follow up.
At the same time, an EHR that is connected to multiple labs and radiology centers and has access to their specific rules can generate information the provider needs to ensure a clean and complete order that will return results to the right patient chart. Automatically generated patient instructions for test preparation provide the educational information to properly prepare the patient for the test and avoid the need for a repeat test.
Image Source: www.medicaldatamanagementgroup.com
 
Once the result is received, it is critical that the physician be able to communicate the result quickly and accurately to the patient. Unfortunately, the second most cited complaint about physicians in a recent Consumer Reports study was slow reporting of test results to the patient. Medical groups can address that concern by establishing lab connections that can send lab results to the patient electronically when they arrive.  Mobile access to the information enables physicians to retrieve results and speak with patients from any location thereby improving communications between physician and patient.
Improved workflow
Automating the process of applying routing rules and generating guidelines for completion of the order reduces the upfront staff time required to prepare the patient for a future test or draw blood for a panel of tests.  Different insurance companies often require specific labs to be used and each lab often requires different information be made available about the patient before the test can be ordered. By having these rules available and enabled electronically, there is a reduction in the number of orders submitted to the wrong lab or orders being submitted without sufficient patient information, ensuring accuracy in running the test and reporting the results.
Accurate orders also reduce the number of unsolicited results received by the practice. Errors in spelling of name, date of birth, and other areas delay filing of the results in the patient’s chart and require staff time to resolve.
From the patient’s perspective, less time waiting in the office for staff to provide lab locations and preparation instructions, and having results easily accessible for review, translates into a less stressful experience.

Image Source: www.microdea.com
Easy access to data
With patient-level data essential for identification of trends and development of best practices for population health management, the EHR fills a critical role by providing access to test results that document efficacy of treatment. Connection to multiple labs in a way that normalizes codes used by each lab to match codes used by the provider’s EHR enables physicians to see the complete picture of a patient’s response to treatment in one record. This holistic view of a single patient or a specific population leads to better informed treatment decisions and creation of population health strategies.
While there are significant benefits to automating communications between medical practices and labs, it is important to understand an EHR system’s capabilities to communicate with labs outside the practice. A few key questions to ask include:
• Does the EHR have its own result codes? Does it support industry standards such as LOINC?
• Does the EHR vendor provide result mapping services to normalize codes from multiple labs to fit the EHR requirements? How are result code maps maintained and updated?
• Does the physician have to select a lab before placing an order or does the EHR automatically route the order to the correct lab?
• Is medical necessity checked when the physician places the order to identify potential out-of-pocket costs for the patient?
• Does the EHR’s lab communication feature improve staff workflow by eliminating manual tasks?
• Will a cloud-based intermediary provide the enhanced functions to address a lack of functions within an existing EHR?
There is no doubt that EHRs and the ability to automate lab orders and results improve the patient experience and the quality of care. Healthcare organizations that optimize the EHR’s capability to communicate with multiple labs not only realize valuable efficiencies and enhance patient care but also improve the overall patient experience.
TSI Healthcare is among the leading implementers and training providers for topnotch technological solutions in healthcare.  TSI healthcare empowers its clients to upgrade medical technologies for better patient experience.  Visit the company website to learn more about the modernizing healthcare industry in the country.

Thursday, August 8, 2013

Are incentives from electronic health records worth the cost and time?


Image source: zweenahealth.com

If healthcare providers started working for incentives in 2011, they would have acquired them as late as 2016. The qualification process, which may net as much as $63,750 for each professional, requires all practitioners to complete three steps over a period of at least five years.

Stage one is completed in the first three years of the program. It focuses on retrieving, saving, and sharing the pulled data. This includes digitizing all the relevant, previously handwritten or typewritten information. It may also include scanning certain charts, along with x-rays and laboratory tests.

Recording all patient history is not for the exclusive use of a single hospital; it will also send the same information to other related healthcare professionals upon request. Information exchange also occurs across specialists: cardiologists may be notified of their patients’ consultations with pulmonary specialists in neighboring health centers, and vice versa. Through this system, physicians will also be able to triangulate and coordinate prescriptions.

By stage two, these patient care summaries should not just be available to those who provide treatment; they must also be ready for patients upon their request. This requires practitioners to give e-prescriptions and integrate the latest laboratory results after patient visits.


Image source: pushpa.biz

After two years, healthcare providers may move on to stage three. Here, they will be expected to run an efficient program with the use of EHRs. They must operate ‘population health management’ with stability, while continuing to grant patients access to their own information.

For healthcare providers, going digital comes with a hefty price. Funds are funneled toward software purchase and acclimatizing healthcare professionals to the environment of digital records and network systems. The process, which takes half a decade at the minimum to complete, may seem daunting for medical practitioners– all of whom are simultaneously attending to their patients. Though the added 'Meaningful Use' incentive encourages timely participation, some wonder if the tens of thousands of dollars in cost are worth the time.

In any case, digital records seem to be the next practical step and, in line with the generalized use of smartphones and tablets, a welcome catch-up strategy for the current system. Documenting progress throughout five years not only yields monetary gain, it also leaves healthcare providers with an abundance of data they can use to improve their service.


Image source: ehealthworx.com

TSI Healthcare is committed to easing physicians into the use of technology in their everyday work. This website provides more information about how this integration is achieved.